<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>The Tlog - a technology blog &#187; flash</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetlog.net/tag/flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetlog.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 11:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/pt/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Using 64-bit Firefox on Linux</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2007/04/19/using-64-bit-firefox-on-linux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetlog.net/2007/04/19/using-64-bit-firefox-on-linux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Timóteo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix / Linux / *BSD software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[64-bit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[autofox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[java]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nspluginwrapper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2007/04/19/using-64-bit-firefox-on-linux/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the dawn of 64-bit Linux distros, they have included 32-bit versions of browsers such as Firefox, because there aren&#8217;t 64-bit versions of plugins such as Java (the 64-bit version doesn&#8217;t have a plugin) or Flash. A couple of days ago, however, I was reading the &#8220;what&#8217;s new&#8221; list for Suse 10.3 Alpha 3, and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content" style="float:left;"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-vertical"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://www.thetlog.net/2007/04/19/using-64-bit-firefox-on-linux/" data-text="Using 64-bit Firefox on Linux" data-count="" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-vertical"><script>
			<!-- 
			var fbShare = {
				url: "http://www.thetlog.net/2007/04/19/using-64-bit-firefox-on-linux/",
				size: "large",
				google_analytics: "true"
			}
			//-->
			</script>
                        <script src="http://widgets.fbshare.me/files/fbshare.js"></script></div></div><p>Since the dawn of 64-bit Linux distros, they have included 32-bit versions of browsers such as Firefox, because there aren&#8217;t 64-bit versions of plugins such as Java <small>(the 64-bit version doesn&#8217;t have a plugin)</small> or Flash.</p>
<p>A couple of days ago, however, I was reading the &#8220;what&#8217;s new&#8221; list for <a href="http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-announce/2007-04/msg00003.html">Suse 10.3 Alpha 3</a>, and found this entry:</p>
<blockquote><p>On x86-64: Firefox is now a 64-bit package and uses nspluginwrapper to handle 32-bit i386 plugins if needed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Naturally, I had to investigate. I downloaded a 64-bit build of Firefox from <a href="http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?t=517749&#038;sid=87a7d6d385a9da72e250edeb70fe4007">Autofox</a>, and <a href="http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/projects/nspluginwrapper/">nspluginwrapper</a>. With that wrapper, I can use Flash without any problems. <small>(Not Java, though; I think <a href="http://www.blackdown.org/">Blackdown</a> offers a 64-bit plugin, but it&#8217;s Java 1.4.2 only. But I have found out that I don&#8217;t miss Java in the browser at all, for the past few days.)</small></p>
<p>The browser <i>feels</i> faster. I tend to use bookmark folders to open dozens of bookmarks at the same time on different tabs, which actually makes the browser &#8220;hang&#8221; for a couple of seconds, and those delays seem <i>shorter</i> now. No, I didn&#8217;t do any benchmarks. But the overall experience just &#8220;feels&#8221; better. It even appears to be more <i>stable</i>, though that may actually come from the fact that I&#8217;m using a 2.0.0.4pre build, which is the latest version (2.0.0.3) plus bugfixes&#8230; or maybe it&#8217;s because this version was built with a non-ancient, and possibly less buggy compiler.</p>
<hr/>Copyright &copy; 2012 <strong><a href="http://www.thetlog.net">The Tlog - a technology blog</a></strong> ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetlog.net/2007/04/19/using-64-bit-firefox-on-linux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flash 9 for Linux (beta) is finally available</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/10/19/flash-9-for-linux-beta-is-finally-available/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/10/19/flash-9-for-linux-beta-is-finally-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2006 16:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Timóteo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Browsers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Unix / Linux / *BSD software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[totalwar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/10/19/flash-9-for-linux-beta-is-finally-available/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(seen on ruimoura.net) At last! Until recently, the newest version was Flash 7, which is only a couple of years old. But now you can download the Flash 9 beta, which is working perfectly here (SUSE 10.1)! Now I can enter TotalWar.com again! EDIT: just switched back to Flash 7. Some pages, such as this [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="socialize-in-content" style="float:left;"><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-vertical"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://www.thetlog.net/2006/10/19/flash-9-for-linux-beta-is-finally-available/" data-text="Flash 9 for Linux (beta) is finally available" data-count="" data-via="socializeWP" ><!--Tweetter--></a></div><div class="socialize-in-button socialize-in-button-vertical"><script>
			<!-- 
			var fbShare = {
				url: "http://www.thetlog.net/2006/10/19/flash-9-for-linux-beta-is-finally-available/",
				size: "large",
				google_analytics: "true"
			}
			//-->
			</script>
                        <script src="http://widgets.fbshare.me/files/fbshare.js"></script></div></div><p><small>(seen on <a href="http://ruimoura.net/blog/2006/10/19/flash-player-9-finalmente-disponivel-para-linux/">ruimoura.net</a>)</small></p>
<p>At last! Until recently, the newest version was Flash 7, which is only a couple of years old. But now you can download the <a href="http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer9.html">Flash 9 beta</a>, which is working perfectly here (SUSE 10.1)!</p>
<p>Now I can enter <a href="http://www.totalwar.com/">TotalWar.com</a> again! <img src='http://www.thetlog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><b>EDIT:</b> just switched back to Flash 7. Some pages, such as <a href="http://www.forbes.com/business/businesstech/feeds/ap/2006/10/19/ap3105425.html">this one</a>, made the browser hang for several seconds each time I switched to that tab &#8211; and that&#8217;s in a fast computer. It seems the &#8220;beta&#8221; label is well deserved. <img src='http://www.thetlog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<hr/>Copyright &copy; 2012 <strong><a href="http://www.thetlog.net">The Tlog - a technology blog</a></strong> ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/10/19/flash-9-for-linux-beta-is-finally-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

