<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Tlog - a technology blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetlog.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetlog.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:55:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to stop people from stealing your blog&#8217;s content by Blog better</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/08/29/how-to-stop-people-from-stealing-your-blogs-content/#comment-36518</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog better</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:55:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/08/29/how-to-stop-people-from-stealing-your-blogs-content/#comment-36518</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Blog better...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]How to stop people from stealing your blog&#039;s content The Tlog &#8211; a technology blog[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Blog better&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]How to stop people from stealing your blog&#039;s content The Tlog &#8211; a technology blog[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on For the Portuguese-speaking paranoids out there&#8230; by Maryjane</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2007/06/20/for-the-portuguese-speaking-paranoids-out-there/#comment-36517</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryjane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 01:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2007/06/20/for-the-portuguese-speaking-paranoids-out-there/#comment-36517</guid>
		<description>It is nearly impossible to find knowledgeable individuals for this niche, nevertheless, you sound like you fully understand what exactly you are discussing! Regards</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is nearly impossible to find knowledgeable individuals for this niche, nevertheless, you sound like you fully understand what exactly you are discussing! Regards</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Twitter by kiev escorts</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2007/01/26/twitter/#comment-36516</link>
		<dc:creator>kiev escorts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 00:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2007/01/26/twitter/#comment-36516</guid>
		<description>Good site, nice easy about the sight as well as good articles far too. I really hope to cultivate a similar way of writing for your requirements one day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good site, nice easy about the sight as well as good articles far too. I really hope to cultivate a similar way of writing for your requirements one day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on HTML, CSS and tables by red lights fix</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/03/29/html-css-and-tables/#comment-36478</link>
		<dc:creator>red lights fix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/03/29/html-css-and-tables/#comment-36478</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;red lights fix...&lt;/strong&gt;

[...]HTML, CSS and tables The Tlog &#8211; a technology blog[...]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>red lights fix&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>[...]HTML, CSS and tables The Tlog &#8211; a technology blog[...]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Assorted new releases by pqlgispohvl</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/06/21/assorted-new-releases/#comment-36477</link>
		<dc:creator>pqlgispohvl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 09:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/06/21/assorted-new-releases/#comment-36477</guid>
		<description>PTyk96  &lt;a href=&quot;http://bcxkdaoxvqdo.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bcxkdaoxvqdo&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PTyk96  <a href="http://bcxkdaoxvqdo.com/" rel="nofollow">bcxkdaoxvqdo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Assorted new releases by Katherine</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/06/21/assorted-new-releases/#comment-36471</link>
		<dc:creator>Katherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 18:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/06/21/assorted-new-releases/#comment-36471</guid>
		<description>I actually found this more enetartinnig than James Joyce.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually found this more enetartinnig than James Joyce.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More on randomizing ads by jcxjunwpmi</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/02/09/more-on-randomizing-ads/#comment-36469</link>
		<dc:creator>jcxjunwpmi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 09:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/02/09/more-on-randomizing-ads/#comment-36469</guid>
		<description>c9FKSf  &lt;a href=&quot;http://mmusvhtptwvh.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mmusvhtptwvh&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>c9FKSf  <a href="http://mmusvhtptwvh.com/" rel="nofollow">mmusvhtptwvh</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is the Xbox 360 the second coming of the Sega Dreamcast? by Kristen</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2005/11/07/is-the-xbox-360-the-second-coming-of-the-sega-dreamcast/#comment-36468</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:17:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=163#comment-36468</guid>
		<description>This is the appropriate weblog for anyone who desires to find out about this topic. You understand a lot its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really would want…HaHa). You positively put a brand new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, simply nice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the appropriate weblog for anyone who desires to find out about this topic. You understand a lot its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really would want…HaHa). You positively put a brand new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Nice stuff, simply nice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More on randomizing ads by zpiscnwbdld</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/02/09/more-on-randomizing-ads/#comment-36467</link>
		<dc:creator>zpiscnwbdld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 09:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/02/09/more-on-randomizing-ads/#comment-36467</guid>
		<description>Pqonpj  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ugypikbjidtj.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ugypikbjidtj&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pqonpj  <a href="http://ugypikbjidtj.com/" rel="nofollow">ugypikbjidtj</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Blogging tips #9: Quantity by NEX-5N</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2005/09/03/blogging-tips-9-quantity/#comment-36466</link>
		<dc:creator>NEX-5N</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=29#comment-36466</guid>
		<description>Определено имам желание да се достави бързо концепция, за да ви благодаря за хубавите съвети и напътствия, които сте командироването на този сайт. Моето време отнема интернет се появи до сега бяха възнаградени с полезни стратегии, да обменят с моето семейство и приятели. Бих се твърди, че ние, читателите факта, са наистина благословени да живеят в полезен общност с невероятно някои големи личности, с проницателен точки. Аз наистина се чувствам наистина благодарен, за да получите открити на уеб страницата и да се появи пред много допълнителни забавни моменти, които четат тук. Благодаря отново добра сделка за добра сделка на нещата.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Определено имам желание да се достави бързо концепция, за да ви благодаря за хубавите съвети и напътствия, които сте командироването на този сайт. Моето време отнема интернет се появи до сега бяха възнаградени с полезни стратегии, да обменят с моето семейство и приятели. Бих се твърди, че ние, читателите факта, са наистина благословени да живеят в полезен общност с невероятно някои големи личности, с проницателен точки. Аз наистина се чувствам наистина благодарен, за да получите открити на уеб страницата и да се появи пред много допълнителни забавни моменти, които четат тук. Благодаря отново добра сделка за добра сделка на нещата.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More on randomizing ads by Eldora</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/02/09/more-on-randomizing-ads/#comment-36465</link>
		<dc:creator>Eldora</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 07:54:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/02/09/more-on-randomizing-ads/#comment-36465</guid>
		<description>A million thanks for posting this ionfrmtiaon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A million thanks for posting this ionfrmtiaon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ProfiMail and the Gmail &quot;untrusted certificate&quot; by jocuri</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/31/profimail-and-the-gmail-untrusted-certificate/#comment-36464</link>
		<dc:creator>jocuri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 20:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/31/profimail-and-the-gmail-untrusted-certificate/#comment-36464</guid>
		<description>As someone said above, nothing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone said above, nothing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Firefox tip: closing tabs with middle-click on Linux by Android Apk Files</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/firefox-tip-closing-tabs-with-middle-click-on-linux/#comment-36463</link>
		<dc:creator>Android Apk Files</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/firefox-tip-closing-tabs-with-middle-click-on-linux/#comment-36463</guid>
		<description>I like the valuable info you provide in your articles. 
I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I am quite certain I&#039;ll learn many new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!
Best Regards Veronica</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the valuable info you provide in your articles.<br />
I will bookmark your blog and check again here regularly. I am quite certain I&#8217;ll learn many new stuff right here! Best of luck for the next!<br />
Best Regards Veronica</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ProfiMail and the Gmail &quot;untrusted certificate&quot; by Kristaps Knets</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/31/profimail-and-the-gmail-untrusted-certificate/#comment-36459</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristaps Knets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/31/profimail-and-the-gmail-untrusted-certificate/#comment-36459</guid>
		<description>I was looking at some of your articles on this website and I conceive this website is rattling instructive! Keep on putting up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking at some of your articles on this website and I conceive this website is rattling instructive! Keep on putting up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What if everyone used SPF? by Pedro Timóteo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2009/11/27/what-if-everyone-used-spf/#comment-35600</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Timóteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:04:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=528#comment-35600</guid>
		<description>The point of things like these is not to perfectly end spam, just to make things more difficult for spammers (and, in case of SPF, mostly for phishers, as you say). The fact that something isn&#039;t a 100% perfect solution for a problem doesn&#039;t mean that it isn&#039;t still a good idea.

I don&#039;t know if a domain black list is viable, and it wouldn&#039;t be a magical solution, of course, since, again as you say, it&#039;s just a matter of registering a new domain. But there&#039;s still &lt;i&gt;that&lt;/i&gt; additional effort (and expense). In an SPF world, a new domain would have no more than &lt;i&gt;hours&lt;/i&gt; of spam sending before being universally blocked for good. Nope, again this wouldn&#039;t end spam. But spam works because it&#039;s incredibly easy and cheap to send millions of emails; everything that makes it even a tiny little bit &lt;i&gt;less&lt;/i&gt; easy or cheap makes a difference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point of things like these is not to perfectly end spam, just to make things more difficult for spammers (and, in case of SPF, mostly for phishers, as you say). The fact that something isn&#8217;t a 100% perfect solution for a problem doesn&#8217;t mean that it isn&#8217;t still a good idea.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if a domain black list is viable, and it wouldn&#8217;t be a magical solution, of course, since, again as you say, it&#8217;s just a matter of registering a new domain. But there&#8217;s still <i>that</i> additional effort (and expense). In an SPF world, a new domain would have no more than <i>hours</i> of spam sending before being universally blocked for good. Nope, again this wouldn&#8217;t end spam. But spam works because it&#8217;s incredibly easy and cheap to send millions of emails; everything that makes it even a tiny little bit <i>less</i> easy or cheap makes a difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What if everyone used SPF? by Gonçalo Silva</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2009/11/27/what-if-everyone-used-spf/#comment-35595</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonçalo Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 19:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=528#comment-35595</guid>
		<description>So, mailling lists are abusing SMTP protocol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, mailling lists are abusing SMTP protocol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What if everyone used SPF? by Gonçalo Silva</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2009/11/27/what-if-everyone-used-spf/#comment-35594</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonçalo Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=528#comment-35594</guid>
		<description>Exactly, Spammers fakes emails senders cuz they don&#039;t wanna buy domains, not because is important for the SPAM to successes, and making “From:” and the “To:” the same proves it. SPF world implementation would give godaddy and alikes a little more money, but wouldn´t stop spam.  RBL&#039;s would have names instead for numbers, not a big difference, i think.

I could buy one domain, myspam.org, and making thousands of subdomains for free using it for senders address.
If the RBL&#039;s instead of listing all my subdmains, decides to block all with something like *.myspam.org, i would buy some subdomains on co.uk making spam from it, doing a mail DoS to all others legitimize co.uk submains. Not that easy to make an domain black list is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly, Spammers fakes emails senders cuz they don&#8217;t wanna buy domains, not because is important for the SPAM to successes, and making “From:” and the “To:” the same proves it. SPF world implementation would give godaddy and alikes a little more money, but wouldn´t stop spam.  RBL&#8217;s would have names instead for numbers, not a big difference, i think.</p>
<p>I could buy one domain, myspam.org, and making thousands of subdomains for free using it for senders address.<br />
If the RBL&#8217;s instead of listing all my subdmains, decides to block all with something like *.myspam.org, i would buy some subdomains on co.uk making spam from it, doing a mail DoS to all others legitimize co.uk submains. Not that easy to make an domain black list is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What if everyone used SPF? by Pedro Timóteo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2009/11/27/what-if-everyone-used-spf/#comment-35592</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Timóteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:09:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=528#comment-35592</guid>
		<description>Well, I was using &quot;spammers&quot; as a catch-all term for &quot;bad guys who send email&quot;. Besides, most anti-spam systems treat phishing emails as a form of spam (e.g. Gmail&#039;s spam folder, or SpamAssassin.) However, in my experience a lot of them (actual spammers trying to sell Viagra, not phishers) really fake their email addresses -- for instance, using the destination address as both the &quot;From:&quot; and the &quot;To:&quot;. If they are prevented from doing that, it makes it possible -- not easy, but certainly doable -- to have a &lt;i&gt;sender domain black list&lt;/i&gt;, which would, I think, help a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I was using &#8220;spammers&#8221; as a catch-all term for &#8220;bad guys who send email&#8221;. Besides, most anti-spam systems treat phishing emails as a form of spam (e.g. Gmail&#8217;s spam folder, or SpamAssassin.) However, in my experience a lot of them (actual spammers trying to sell Viagra, not phishers) really fake their email addresses &#8212; for instance, using the destination address as both the &#8220;From:&#8221; and the &#8220;To:&#8221;. If they are prevented from doing that, it makes it possible &#8212; not easy, but certainly doable &#8212; to have a <i>sender domain black list</i>, which would, I think, help a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What if everyone used SPF? by Pedro Timóteo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2009/11/27/what-if-everyone-used-spf/#comment-35591</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Timóteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=528#comment-35591</guid>
		<description>Weird... the implementation I&#039;m using seems to be indeed checking the &quot;From:&quot;.

The &quot;send to a friend&quot; functionality, as currently implemented, is, IMO, abusing SMTP. If you invite a friend in Facebook, the invitation email should be from Facebook, not &quot;from&quot; you, I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird&#8230; the implementation I&#8217;m using seems to be indeed checking the &#8220;From:&#8221;.</p>
<p>The &#8220;send to a friend&#8221; functionality, as currently implemented, is, IMO, abusing SMTP. If you invite a friend in Facebook, the invitation email should be from Facebook, not &#8220;from&#8221; you, I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What if everyone used SPF? by Gonçalo Silva</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2009/11/27/what-if-everyone-used-spf/#comment-35590</link>
		<dc:creator>Gonçalo Silva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 17:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=528#comment-35590</guid>
		<description>&quot;The faking of sender addresses. Who ever does that? Spammers&quot;

You confuse Spammers and Phishers, not exactly the same kind of people.
Even if SPF was adopted by the World, SPAM wouldn&#039;t stop. SPAM exists cuz people react to it, meaning in this case people go see the site and perhaps buys the product. For this kind of people doesn&#039;t matter the sender&#039;s domain, only the Subject, if it&#039;s about viagra and they have a small dick they will open it. Today most SPAM comes from domains senders that has nothing to do with the PUB on it 

Who normally sends fake senders address are phishers, but this wouldn&#039;t stop phishing, cuz the real problem is people&#039;s brains size.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The faking of sender addresses. Who ever does that? Spammers&#8221;</p>
<p>You confuse Spammers and Phishers, not exactly the same kind of people.<br />
Even if SPF was adopted by the World, SPAM wouldn&#8217;t stop. SPAM exists cuz people react to it, meaning in this case people go see the site and perhaps buys the product. For this kind of people doesn&#8217;t matter the sender&#8217;s domain, only the Subject, if it&#8217;s about viagra and they have a small dick they will open it. Today most SPAM comes from domains senders that has nothing to do with the PUB on it </p>
<p>Who normally sends fake senders address are phishers, but this wouldn&#8217;t stop phishing, cuz the real problem is people&#8217;s brains size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What if everyone used SPF? by Vítor Pires</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2009/11/27/what-if-everyone-used-spf/#comment-35589</link>
		<dc:creator>Vítor Pires</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 16:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=528#comment-35589</guid>
		<description>http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Envelope_from_scope

Despite believing it could help it&#039;s still possible to use a &quot;sender/return-path&quot; header with a different domain &quot;from&quot; header and the one which is checked is the &quot;sender&quot; one which is the right way in my view.

Imagina the &quot;send to a friend&quot; functionality in some websites. You want it to be identified as you sending but the actual sender to be the site itself so it won&#039;t be marked as spam. Of course this could be used by some spammers to send mails but still obey to the spf check..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Envelope_from_scope" rel="nofollow">http://www.openspf.org/FAQ/Envelope_from_scope</a></p>
<p>Despite believing it could help it&#8217;s still possible to use a &#8220;sender/return-path&#8221; header with a different domain &#8220;from&#8221; header and the one which is checked is the &#8220;sender&#8221; one which is the right way in my view.</p>
<p>Imagina the &#8220;send to a friend&#8221; functionality in some websites. You want it to be identified as you sending but the actual sender to be the site itself so it won&#8217;t be marked as spam. Of course this could be used by some spammers to send mails but still obey to the spf check..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Work: why a good sysadmin has a lot of free time by What is Behind Pythian&#8217;s Growth and Market Success? &#124; Pythian Group Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2005/09/12/work-why-a-good-sysadmin-has-a-lot-of-free-time/#comment-35577</link>
		<dc:creator>What is Behind Pythian&#8217;s Growth and Market Success? &#124; Pythian Group Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 21:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=56#comment-35577</guid>
		<description>[...] here has discovered the essential truth of most sysadmin or DBA jobs: if you&#8217;re any good, you will soon be bored and under-appreciated. (That&#8217;s a different [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] here has discovered the essential truth of most sysadmin or DBA jobs: if you&#8217;re any good, you will soon be bored and under-appreciated. (That&#8217;s a different [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Saga of the Nintendo DS and the Linksys WRK54G, part 2 by moli</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2005/12/19/the-saga-of-the-nintendo-ds-and-the-linksys-wrk54g-part-2/#comment-35576</link>
		<dc:creator>moli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=228#comment-35576</guid>
		<description>Dear Pedro,
i would like to ask for your help. 

At home i have an internet connection plugged into the WAN port of a D-Link DIR-300 router. There is a desktop computer connected by cable and a server computer also connected by cable to the router. I also have a netbook connected by WPA2 and my Nintendo Wii also uses WPA2.

But i have a Nintendo DS Lite which as you know does not support WPA2 and i do not want to lower my network security to WEP. So i bought a wifi dongle.

I would like to plug this dongle into the server and share the server&#039;s cable network access to the router - which connects to the internet. The problem is i use linux on my server and i dont know how to do this. I installed ubuntu 9.10 and removed all packages that use a graphical interface (gnome and than x) so i only have text-mode console access to it.

Can you help me how to install driver, set config?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Pedro,<br />
i would like to ask for your help. </p>
<p>At home i have an internet connection plugged into the WAN port of a D-Link DIR-300 router. There is a desktop computer connected by cable and a server computer also connected by cable to the router. I also have a netbook connected by WPA2 and my Nintendo Wii also uses WPA2.</p>
<p>But i have a Nintendo DS Lite which as you know does not support WPA2 and i do not want to lower my network security to WEP. So i bought a wifi dongle.</p>
<p>I would like to plug this dongle into the server and share the server&#8217;s cable network access to the router &#8211; which connects to the internet. The problem is i use linux on my server and i dont know how to do this. I installed ubuntu 9.10 and removed all packages that use a graphical interface (gnome and than x) so i only have text-mode console access to it.</p>
<p>Can you help me how to install driver, set config?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Caching Google Earth with Squid by poldy</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2005/09/26/caching-google-earth-with-squid/#comment-35535</link>
		<dc:creator>poldy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 08:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=77#comment-35535</guid>
		<description>hey there,

did the same. tuned my squid to use google earth in our company but failed with the above steps. stange thing is, if I use google earth pro (dled the trial version) it works smooth!!! anyone got a clue why?

catch ya
poldy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey there,</p>
<p>did the same. tuned my squid to use google earth in our company but failed with the above steps. stange thing is, if I use google earth pro (dled the trial version) it works smooth!!! anyone got a clue why?</p>
<p>catch ya<br />
poldy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on ProfiMail and the Gmail &quot;untrusted certificate&quot; by Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/31/profimail-and-the-gmail-untrusted-certificate/#comment-35534</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 21:58:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/31/profimail-and-the-gmail-untrusted-certificate/#comment-35534</guid>
		<description>Can any1 please send me a download link for downloading those gmail certificates,im using profimail client on my nokia 6600</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can any1 please send me a download link for downloading those gmail certificates,im using profimail client on my nokia 6600</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

