<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ubuntu vs SUSE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: 873ad8882f5c</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-35281</link>
		<dc:creator>873ad8882f5c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 05:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-35281</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;873ad8882f5c...&lt;/strong&gt;

873ad8882f5c3e9b566d...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>873ad8882f5c&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>873ad8882f5c3e9b566d&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIMO</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-35252</link>
		<dc:creator>MIMO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:41:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-35252</guid>
		<description>Well, it's me again.

Suse is really working better on my laptop. But, on my Desktop I find that ubuntu is doing a lot of marvelous things. From the box it does: recognize my WiFi card, my TV tuner, my Nvidia VGA... Working faster than winXP or Suse 10.2 and still stable after 5 months of experiments and hard work. You can do everything on it. Sure, Gnome of Ubuntu is a bit hard to use, but you can get used to it!
KDE is more like windows interface so windows people will like it more but on the other hand, it has a lot of programs and options that you may never use.

I donùt know why I have the impression that the opensuse program is like a testing OS for free while ubuntu is a real Linux OS to use. Suse is getting slower in time and you may face a lot of crashes (KDE fault)... 

My first experience was with ubuntu 7.04 and my now distribution is ubuntu 7.10 and believe me, there are a lot of improvements.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s me again.</p>
<p>Suse is really working better on my laptop. But, on my Desktop I find that ubuntu is doing a lot of marvelous things. From the box it does: recognize my WiFi card, my TV tuner, my Nvidia VGA&#8230; Working faster than winXP or Suse 10.2 and still stable after 5 months of experiments and hard work. You can do everything on it. Sure, Gnome of Ubuntu is a bit hard to use, but you can get used to it!<br />
KDE is more like windows interface so windows people will like it more but on the other hand, it has a lot of programs and options that you may never use.</p>
<p>I donùt know why I have the impression that the opensuse program is like a testing OS for free while ubuntu is a real Linux OS to use. Suse is getting slower in time and you may face a lot of crashes (KDE fault)&#8230; </p>
<p>My first experience was with ubuntu 7.04 and my now distribution is ubuntu 7.10 and believe me, there are a lot of improvements.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will G</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-35199</link>
		<dc:creator>Will G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 04:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-35199</guid>
		<description>By no means am I an expert with Linux.  As a newbie to Linux I started with Ubuntu because all of the great things I heard about it.  I used it, and being new had a lot to learn about how linux worked.  I'm better now still no expert but over the past few months I used Ubuntu then uninstalled, played with Knoppix some, then Kubuntu then openSuse.  For my tastes I prefer openSuse over Ubuntu.  I had less problems getting things configured with openSuse on my older computer.  Ubuntu wouldn't let me install certain programs very easily.  OpenSuse works great for me and btw I'm using Gnome on it vs. KDE, I like the Gnome GUI better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By no means am I an expert with Linux.  As a newbie to Linux I started with Ubuntu because all of the great things I heard about it.  I used it, and being new had a lot to learn about how linux worked.  I&#8217;m better now still no expert but over the past few months I used Ubuntu then uninstalled, played with Knoppix some, then Kubuntu then openSuse.  For my tastes I prefer openSuse over Ubuntu.  I had less problems getting things configured with openSuse on my older computer.  Ubuntu wouldn&#8217;t let me install certain programs very easily.  OpenSuse works great for me and btw I&#8217;m using Gnome on it vs. KDE, I like the Gnome GUI better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Timóteo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-26446</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Timóteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jun 2007 15:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-26446</guid>
		<description>Strangely enough, nowadays (which is about 10 months after my initial post), I prefer Ubuntu for servers (you really can't beat apt-get), but as a desktop, I'm really more used to Suse, so I keep using it. An initial Ubuntu installation would simply take too long to configure "as I like it."

It's a matter of personal taste, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strangely enough, nowadays (which is about 10 months after my initial post), I prefer Ubuntu for servers (you really can&#8217;t beat apt-get), but as a desktop, I&#8217;m really more used to Suse, so I keep using it. An initial Ubuntu installation would simply take too long to configure &#8220;as I like it.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a matter of personal taste, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MIMO</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-26267</link>
		<dc:creator>MIMO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 10:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-26267</guid>
		<description>After 3 weeks using Ubuntu 7.04 I think I'll go back to suse 10.2! Ubuntu is a great distro I agree! but on my laptop Asus A2H the Suse is just working better...

I feel that suse is the best for me :)

That's all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After 3 weeks using Ubuntu 7.04 I think I&#8217;ll go back to suse 10.2! Ubuntu is a great distro I agree! but on my laptop Asus A2H the Suse is just working better&#8230;</p>
<p>I feel that suse is the best for me <img src='http://www.thetlog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
That&#8217;s all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akaakmdm</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-19056</link>
		<dc:creator>akaakmdm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 10:18:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-19056</guid>
		<description>I think that the best linux distros are the ones you feel are the best.  If you like Ubuntu, it's probably suited for you.  I've worked with Ubuntu and Suse and they are both great.  It just depends on what you use em for</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the best linux distros are the ones you feel are the best.  If you like Ubuntu, it&#8217;s probably suited for you.  I&#8217;ve worked with Ubuntu and Suse and they are both great.  It just depends on what you use em for</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abhay Kumar Srivastav</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-11058</link>
		<dc:creator>Abhay Kumar Srivastav</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-11058</guid>
		<description>I have Kubuntu Edgy ( 6.10 ) and I think it is extremly polished and reliable distribution.
It has almost all the requisit software I need, with a default install.
Let me elaborate:
1) It has Openoffice 2.04, Firefox 2.0, gimp, gtkam. 
2) Upstart- the new init replacement, makes boot very fast.
3) The default desktop theme is to my taste.
4) adept is great as package manager.
5) My wireless card was automatically configured and I was connected
   to internet just by doing a login to KDE. Otherwise networkmanager
   is equally dependable. 
6)It uses libqt4-core with a support for libqt3, so I can actually install the beta version of KDE 4.0
7) Here comes the best part about Kubuntu --&#62; It community. Even a guy 
like me posts reply, why becoz I get so instant replies that I feel I
am obleiged to post reply for questions whose answer I know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have Kubuntu Edgy ( 6.10 ) and I think it is extremly polished and reliable distribution.<br />
It has almost all the requisit software I need, with a default install.<br />
Let me elaborate:<br />
1) It has Openoffice 2.04, Firefox 2.0, gimp, gtkam.<br />
2) Upstart- the new init replacement, makes boot very fast.<br />
3) The default desktop theme is to my taste.<br />
4) adept is great as package manager.<br />
5) My wireless card was automatically configured and I was connected<br />
   to internet just by doing a login to KDE. Otherwise networkmanager<br />
   is equally dependable.<br />
6)It uses libqt4-core with a support for libqt3, so I can actually install the beta version of KDE 4.0<br />
7) Here comes the best part about Kubuntu &#8211;&gt; It community. Even a guy<br />
like me posts reply, why becoz I get so instant replies that I feel I<br />
am obleiged to post reply for questions whose answer I know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-9397</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:37:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-9397</guid>
		<description>I use OpenSuse 10.1 and considering moving to kubuntu in the next month, first because i received this beautiful 20 cd's package 10 ubuntu 10 kubuntu totally free. second because updating in Suse never work, i use apt 4 suse because i fell yast package management may be suitable for newbies, however it needs some improvement on user friendliness because apt rules.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use OpenSuse 10.1 and considering moving to kubuntu in the next month, first because i received this beautiful 20 cd&#8217;s package 10 ubuntu 10 kubuntu totally free. second because updating in Suse never work, i use apt 4 suse because i fell yast package management may be suitable for newbies, however it needs some improvement on user friendliness because apt rules.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chandra Sekar</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-7198</link>
		<dc:creator>Chandra Sekar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2006 11:18:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-7198</guid>
		<description>SUSE is no doubt a gr8 distro.  However, Kubuntu is gr8 too.  The Dapper Drake release of Kubuntu, is not bad at all.  It has a polished appearance, and is easy to update and maintain.  The cripple of konqueror can be easily removed.  Visit: http://www.kubuntu.com/faq.php#konqueror

I find Adept to be easier than SUSE's Yast.  Also, SUSE is heavily bloated with 6 CDs of softwares, many of them not used by me.  With Kubuntu, I get a system which has just those softwares which I need.

If you do prefer SUSE, go ahead and use it.  After all, everything is based on Linux kernel and KDE/GNOME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SUSE is no doubt a gr8 distro.  However, Kubuntu is gr8 too.  The Dapper Drake release of Kubuntu, is not bad at all.  It has a polished appearance, and is easy to update and maintain.  The cripple of konqueror can be easily removed.  Visit: <a href="http://www.kubuntu.com/faq.php#konqueror" rel="nofollow">http://www.kubuntu.com/faq.php#konqueror</a></p>
<p>I find Adept to be easier than SUSE&#8217;s Yast.  Also, SUSE is heavily bloated with 6 CDs of softwares, many of them not used by me.  With Kubuntu, I get a system which has just those softwares which I need.</p>
<p>If you do prefer SUSE, go ahead and use it.  After all, everything is based on Linux kernel and KDE/GNOME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pedro Timóteo</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-6318</link>
		<dc:creator>Pedro Timóteo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2006 18:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-6318</guid>
		<description>Jeff: thanks for the reply. However, as far as I know, Ubuntu and Kubuntu aren't that different, except for the fact that one uses Gnome (which I dislike) and the other uses KDE. I know that Ubuntu is the "original" version, and therefore more polished, but I haven't seen anyone saying that Kubuntu is only an afterthought and that Ubuntu is completely different (in other ways than the default desktop). And SUSE's KDE is light years ahead of Kubuntu's.

However, I'm not so conceited that I believe that I'm probably right and everyone else is wrong. :) Everyone talks about how Ubuntu is the best thing since sliced bread, bringing Linux to the masses, and all that... but nobody ever says &lt;b&gt;why&lt;/b&gt;. Therefore, if you please... why?

Oh, and you were right about Firefox. The "About" dialog box said "x86_64", so I thought it was the 64 bit version, but a "&lt;code&gt;file /usr/lib/firefox/firefox-bin&lt;/code&gt;" reveals it to be 32 bit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff: thanks for the reply. However, as far as I know, Ubuntu and Kubuntu aren&#8217;t that different, except for the fact that one uses Gnome (which I dislike) and the other uses KDE. I know that Ubuntu is the &#8220;original&#8221; version, and therefore more polished, but I haven&#8217;t seen anyone saying that Kubuntu is only an afterthought and that Ubuntu is completely different (in other ways than the default desktop). And SUSE&#8217;s KDE is light years ahead of Kubuntu&#8217;s.</p>
<p>However, I&#8217;m not so conceited that I believe that I&#8217;m probably right and everyone else is wrong. <img src='http://www.thetlog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> Everyone talks about how Ubuntu is the best thing since sliced bread, bringing Linux to the masses, and all that&#8230; but nobody ever says <b>why</b>. Therefore, if you please&#8230; why?</p>
<p>Oh, and you were right about Firefox. The &#8220;About&#8221; dialog box said &#8220;x86_64&#8243;, so I thought it was the 64 bit version, but a &#8220;<code>file /usr/lib/firefox/firefox-bin</code>&#8221; reveals it to be 32 bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-6291</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2006 18:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/2006/07/28/ubuntu-vs-suse/#comment-6291</guid>
		<description>First, let me start by saying I am infact a Suse user, and I adore it. However, your post is pretty far off base. Ubuntu is much more advanced then the poor kubuntu distro. Ubunutu has always been thier man focus. Secondly, Suse does not give you 64bit firefox on the amd64. It defaults to the 32bit version so you can have flash and java.  I do agree though, that if you want KDE SUSE or gentoo are the way to go. Although, gnome is poised to muscles kde out of the suse limelight considering they actaully have a few gnome engineers on board now, specifically coding for suse and gnome intergration.  
Ubuntu is a fantastic distro, and more importantly it is bringing linux out into the media. My hope is that this will bring on mass user adoption and with that more standarization between package managemnt on the different distros.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, let me start by saying I am infact a Suse user, and I adore it. However, your post is pretty far off base. Ubuntu is much more advanced then the poor kubuntu distro. Ubunutu has always been thier man focus. Secondly, Suse does not give you 64bit firefox on the amd64. It defaults to the 32bit version so you can have flash and java.  I do agree though, that if you want KDE SUSE or gentoo are the way to go. Although, gnome is poised to muscles kde out of the suse limelight considering they actaully have a few gnome engineers on board now, specifically coding for suse and gnome intergration.<br />
Ubuntu is a fantastic distro, and more importantly it is bringing linux out into the media. My hope is that this will bring on mass user adoption and with that more standarization between package managemnt on the different distros.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
