<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Anti-Spam gateway #2: A note about compiling on Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetlog.net/2005/10/11/an-anti-spam-gateway-2-a-note-about-compiling-on-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2005/10/11/an-anti-spam-gateway-2-a-note-about-compiling-on-linux/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dehumanizer</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2005/10/11/an-anti-spam-gateway-2-a-note-about-compiling-on-linux/#comment-299</link>
		<dc:creator>Dehumanizer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=113#comment-299</guid>
		<description>We're talking about different things, it seems. I only warned that having a library on Linux didn't automatically mean you could compile stuff to use that library, which is a source of frequent confusion. 

On the BSDs, there's no concept of "library without the header files", so, no confusion. Simple as that.

You seem to think I want an OS with "everything but the kitchen sink" by default. Much the opposite - that's why I use OpenBSD at home. :)
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;re talking about different things, it seems. I only warned that having a library on Linux didn&#8217;t automatically mean you could compile stuff to use that library, which is a source of frequent confusion. </p>
<p>On the BSDs, there&#8217;s no concept of &#8220;library without the header files&#8221;, so, no confusion. Simple as that.</p>
<p>You seem to think I want an OS with &#8220;everything but the kitchen sink&#8221; by default. Much the opposite - that&#8217;s why I use OpenBSD at home. <img src='http://www.thetlog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruno Rodrigues</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2005/10/11/an-anti-spam-gateway-2-a-note-about-compiling-on-linux/#comment-298</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruno Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 21:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=113#comment-298</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Incidentally, this is not a problem in the BSDs.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Uh ? Having to install the development libraries together with the standards libraries without a choice to avoid it is, for me, is "the" problem.
Like installing the SSH Daemon every time I simply need the client. What next ? Apache whenever Firefox is installed ? The GCC and (G)LIBC sources whenever I need to compile an hello_world.c ? 

;)

Having split packages is "A GOOD THING™".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Incidentally, this is not a problem in the BSDs.</p></blockquote>
<p>Uh ? Having to install the development libraries together with the standards libraries without a choice to avoid it is, for me, is &#8220;the&#8221; problem.<br />
Like installing the SSH Daemon every time I simply need the client. What next ? Apache whenever Firefox is installed ? The GCC and (G)LIBC sources whenever I need to compile an hello_world.c ? </p>
<p> <img src='http://www.thetlog.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Having split packages is &#8220;A GOOD THING™&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
