<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Symantec and their lies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetlog.net/2005/09/21/symantec-and-their-lies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2005/09/21/symantec-and-their-lies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 13:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.thetlog.net/2005/09/21/symantec-and-their-lies/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 20:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetlog.net/?p=67#comment-145</guid>
		<description>"A thought: if Microsoft ever released a “mostly secure” version of Windows, Symantec would quickly go out of business, don’t you think?"

But they wont. And Symantec will continue releasing security tools and mking money for something that you shouldnt need.

FWIW i dont like Symantec either. Why ? Because i have done count less reinstalls of windows ( ugg ) because the norton's installer messed up or the installation corupeted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A thought: if Microsoft ever released a “mostly secure” version of Windows, Symantec would quickly go out of business, don’t you think?&#8221;</p>
<p>But they wont. And Symantec will continue releasing security tools and mking money for something that you shouldnt need.</p>
<p>FWIW i dont like Symantec either. Why ? Because i have done count less reinstalls of windows ( ugg ) because the norton&#8217;s installer messed up or the installation corupeted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
